Signet, A BBSRC funded Cell Signalling Network BBSRC SIGNET images Signet, A BBSRC funded Cell Signalling Network
  Signet home     news     people     meetings  

Systems Biology of GPCR Signalling 2010 - Schedule

15-16 September 2010

See also: Meeting home | Registration


Wednesday 15 September 2010
10.30 Registration and refreshments
11.00 Welcome
11.15 David Hall (GSK): Adventures in receptor theory - some consequences of constitutive activity for pharmacological analysis (abstract)
12.00 Lloyd Bridge (Nottingham): TBC (abstract)
12.40 CT1 David Sykes (Novartis): Exploring the mechanism of agonist efficacy: A relationship between efficacy and agonist dissociation rate at the muscarinic M3 receptor.
1.00 Lunch
2:00 Eamonn Kelly (Bristol): Measuring relative efficacies of agonists for different signalling outputs (abstract)
2:45 CT2 Henry Vischer (Vrije Amsterdam): The Epstein-Barr virus-encoded G protein-coupled receptor BILF1 hetero-oligomerizes with human CXCR4, scavenges Gαi proteins and constitutively impairs CXCR4 functioning
3:05 CT3 Lauren May (Nottingham/Monash): TBC
3:25 CT4 Wayne Croft (Warwick): A systems biology analysis of G protein-mediated signalling - duel role for RGS
3:45 CT5 Jillian Baker (Nottingham): The selectivity of β-adrenoceptor agonists at the human β1, β2 and β3 adrenoceptors.
4.05 Refreshments
4.30 Graeme Milligan (Glasgow): GPR35: a novel target for the treatment of diabetes, hypertension... and maybe asthma as well? (abstract)
5.30 Poster session and drinks
7.30 Conference Dinner
Thursday 16 September 2010
9.30 Krasi Tsaneva (Bristol): Decoding pulsatile GnRH signals (abstract)
10.15 Chris Langmead (Heptares): When is an agonist selective? Rational data analysis (abstract)
11.00 Refreshments
11.30 Martine Smit (Vrije Amsterdam): Rewiring of cellular signalling networks by viral GPCRs (abstract)
12.15 Steve Charlton (Novartis): Three’s a crowd: Introducing plasma protein to the drug-receptor pair (abstract)
1.00 Lunch
2.00 CT6 Michelle Halls (Cambridge): A pre-assembled GPCR-signalosome with sensitivity to sub-picomolar concentrations of relaxin
2.20 CT7 Wodu Majin (Nottingham): TBC
2.40 CT8 Philippe Marin (CNRS, Montpellier): A phosphoproteomic approach to identify signalling mechanisms engaged by hallucinogens but not by 5-HT2A agonists lacking psychoactive activity
3.00 CT9 Julien Ollivier (McGill / Edinburgh): Scalable rule-based modelling of allosteric proteins and biochemical networks
3.20 Ad IJzerman (Leiden): The crystal structure of the adenosine A2A receptor - implications for GPCR drug design and discovery (abstract)
4.05 Close and refreshments


Abstracts

Lloyd Bridge (Nottingham): TBC 

TBC.

Steve Charlton (Novartis): Three’s a crowd: Introducing plasma protein to the drug-receptor pair

Plasma protein binding is an important consideration in the development of new drugs. Current methods for determining the degree of protein binding utilise LC-MS to directly measure the free concentration of drug in the presence of serum albumin. Typically only a single concentration of drug is used and the result is returned as percentage bound. For poorly bound compounds this is a sufficient ranking tool, but as compounds approach 98 % bound it ceases to be meaningful. For such classes it would be useful to quantify the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of the drug for serum albumin, in the same way as is reported for receptors. This is often not possible for highly bound drugs using LC-MS due to limits of quantification.
Radioligand binding and high throughput functional assays are common, robust techniques that are widely employed in the drug discovery process. We have explored the potential of utilising these assays to estimate the Kd of drugs at serum albumin. Initially we generated mathematical models that allowed us to simulate the effects of introducing plasma protein on both receptor binding and signalling, to assist in experimental design. We then used these equations to directly fit experimental data (e.g. families of curves in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of protein) to estimate the affinity of drug at plasma protein. This talk will outline our experiences to date and discuss the potential future application of this method.

David Hall: Adventures in receptor theory - some consequences of constitutive activity for pharmacological analysis

TBC.

Ad IJzerman: The crystal structure of the adenosine A2A receptor - implications for GPCR drug design and discovery

In the seventies Ariëns, one of pharmacology's godfathers, described a receptor as a beautiful lady whom he wrote letters to, got an answer now and then, accepted she never showed up, but hoping she would one day. Recently, after years of trial-and-error, a number of GPCR crystal structures has been determined: no ladies, but of an intriguing beauty for sure. We were involved in the structure elucidation of the human A2A adenosine receptor in complex with a high affinity antagonist, ZM241385, which was determined to 2.6 Å resolution. Four disulfide bridges in the extracellular domain combined with a subtle repacking of the transmembrane helices relative to the beta-adrenergic and rhodopsin receptor structures define a pocket capable of binding the antagonist in an extended conformation perpendicular to the membrane plane. The binding site highlights an integral role for the extracellular loops together with the helical core in ligand recognition by this class of GPCRs. These findings question the use of rhodopsin or any other single receptor structure in homology modeling studies. On the other hand, we learned that virtual screening of an individual receptor structure (the A2A receptor in our case) can indeed help in finding novel ligands for that particular receptor.

Eamonn Kelly (Bristol): Measuring relative efficacies of agonists for different signalling outputs

Measuring relative efficacies of agonists for different signalling outputs Many people working in the biomedical sciences are unclear as to the meaning of the term “efficacy” in relation to drug action. This is significant because it can influence the conclusions people arrive at with regard to the mechanism of action of drugs. For example many people conclude that if two agonists produce the same maximum response then they have the same efficacy, whereas if quantified their actual efficacies could in fact be very different. In addition, we can correlate the relative efficacies of agonists at a receptor for more than one signaling output to determine whether the two measures correlate. This is a useful way to detect whether or not biased agonism (also called ligand-directed signaling or functional selectivity) is present. In this talk I will illustrate these ideas by using our recent data measuring the efficacy of a series of ligands at MOPr to activate G protein and recruit arrestin.

Chris Langmead - When is an agonist selective? Rational data analysis

TBC.

Graeme Milligan (Glasgow): GPR35: a novel target for the treatment of diabetes, hypertension... and maybe asthma as well? 

TBC.

Martine Smit (Vrije Amsterdam): Rewiring of cellular signalling networks by viral GPCRs 

TBC.

Krasi Tsaneva: Decoding pulsatile GnRH signals 

TBC.


Organising Committee

Lloyd Bridge
Stephen Hill
John King
Lauren May
Markus Owen


See other SIGNET meetings...